Gwrizienn (yezhoniezh) : diforc'h etre ar stummoù

Eus Wikipedia
Endalc’h diverket Danvez ouzhpennet
Neal (kaozeal | degasadennoù)
DDiverradenn ebet eus ar c'hemm
Neal (kaozeal | degasadennoù)
DDiverradenn ebet eus ar c'hemm
Linenn 1: Linenn 1:
{{LabourAChom}}
{{LabourAChom}}


Er [[yezhoniezh]] e vez implijet an termen '''troger''' ([[Saozneg|saoz]]: [[:en:Circumfix|''circumfix'']]) evit komz eus ur [[Morfemenn stag|vorfemenn stag]] daou damm anezhi implijet evel [[kenger]] lakaet a bep tu d'ur [[morfemenn|vorfemenn]] [[Penn (yezhoniezh)|bennañ]], anvet ar [[Gwrizienn (yezhoniezh)|wrizienn]], da skouer an anvioù-gwan-verb rezih en [[alamaneg]]:
Er [[yezhoniezh]] e vez implijet an termen '''gwrizienn ''' ([[Saozneg|saoz]]: [[:en:Root (linguistics)|''root'']]) evit komz eus [[Morfemenn|elfenn]] [[Penn (yezhoniezh)|bennañ]] ur ger. N'ahll ket ur wriziennbezañ isrannet e tammoù bihanoc'h hag enni e kaver an darn vrasañ eus an danvez [[Semantik|semantikel]], da skouer:


The '''root''' is the primary [[lexicology | lexical]] unit of a [[word]], which carries the most significant aspects of [[semantics | semantic]] content and cannot be reduced into smaller constituents. [[Content word]]s in nearly all [[language]]s contain, and may consist only of, root [[morpheme]]s. However, sometimes the term "root" is also used to describe the word minus its [[inflection]]al endings, but with its lexical endings in place. For example, ''chatters'' has the inflectional root or [[lemma (linguistics) | lemma]] ''chatter'', but the lexical root ''chat''. Inflectional roots are often called [[stem (linguistics) | stems]], and a root in the stricter sense may be thought of as a monomorphemic stem.
[[Content word]]s in nearly all [[language]]s contain, and may consist only of, root [[morpheme]]s. However, sometimes the term "root" is also used to describe the word minus its [[inflection]]al endings, but with its lexical endings in place. For example, ''chatters'' has the inflectional root or [[lemma (linguistics) | lemma]] ''chatter'', but the lexical root ''chat''. Inflectional roots are often called [[stem (linguistics) | stems]], and a root in the stricter sense may be thought of as a monomorphemic stem.


Roots can be either [[free morpheme]]s or [[bound morpheme]]s. Root morphemes are essential for [[affixation]] and [[compound (linguistics) | compound]]s.
Roots can be either [[free morpheme]]s or [[bound morpheme]]s. Root morphemes are essential for [[affixation]] and [[compound (linguistics) | compound]]s.

Stumm eus an 24 Meu 2007 da 09:27

Krogit e-barzh !
Un danvez pennad eo ar pennad-mañ ha labour zo d'ober c'hoazh a-raok e beurechuiñ.
Gallout a rit skoazellañ Wikipedia dre glokaat anezhañ

Er yezhoniezh e vez implijet an termen gwrizienn (saoz: root) evit komz eus elfenn bennañ ur ger. N'ahll ket ur wriziennbezañ isrannet e tammoù bihanoc'h hag enni e kaver an darn vrasañ eus an danvez semantikel, da skouer:

Content words in nearly all languages contain, and may consist only of, root morphemes. However, sometimes the term "root" is also used to describe the word minus its inflectional endings, but with its lexical endings in place. For example, chatters has the inflectional root or lemma chatter, but the lexical root chat. Inflectional roots are often called stems, and a root in the stricter sense may be thought of as a monomorphemic stem.

Roots can be either free morphemes or bound morphemes. Root morphemes are essential for affixation and compounds.

The root of a word is a unit of meaning (morpheme) and, as such, it is an abstraction, though it can usually be represented in writing as a word would be. For example, it can be said that the root of the English verb form running is run, or the root of the Spanish superlative adjective amplísimo is ampli-, since those words are clearly derived from the root forms by simple suffixes that do not alter the roots in any way. In particular, English has very little inflection, and hence a tendency to have words that are identical to their roots. But more complicated inflection, as well as other processes, can obscure the root; for example, the root of mice is mouse (still a valid word), and the root of interrupt is, arguably, rupt, which is not a word in English and only appears in derivational forms (such as disrupt, corrupt, rupture, etc.). The root rupt is written as if it were a word, but it's not.

This distinction between the word as a unit of speech and the root as a unit of meaning is even more important in the case of languages where roots have many different forms when used in actual words, as is the case in Semitic languages. In these, roots are formed by consonants alone, and different words (belonging to different parts of speech) are derived from the same root by inserting vowels. For example, in Hebrew, the root gdl represents the idea of largeness, and from it we have gadol and gdola (masculine and feminine forms of the adjective "big"), gadal "he grew", higdil "he magnified" and magdelet "magnifier", along with many other words such as godel "size" and migdal'.

Reconstructed roots

The root of a word, in etymology, has a somewhat different meaning: it may represent an older form. When several languages are believed to be children of one older language, linguists will compare each language to the rest, trying to find matching words and ultimately reconstruct the ancient root. This has been done with several major language families, such as the Indo-European languages and the Semitic family.

Gwelit ivez: